WoRMS taxon details
Notholca striata (Müller, 1786)
134999 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:134999)
accepted
Species
Anourella lyra Bory de St. Vincent, 1826 · unaccepted (unnecessary substitute name)
Brachionus striatus Müller, 1786 · unaccepted > superseded combination
Notholca biremis (Ehrenberg, 1832) · unaccepted > junior objective synonym
(of Brachionus striatus Müller, 1786) Müller, O. F. (1786). Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina, quæ detexit, systematice descripsit et ad vivum delineari curavit. Havniæ, 367, pl.1-50, available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53299693 [details] Available for editors 
[request]
[request]
Taxonomy Type species of genus Notholca Gosse, 1886._x000d_
not Notholca striata (Müller) after Wierzejski (1893), Weber (1898),...
not Notholca striata (Müller) after Wierzejski (1893), Weber (1898),...
Taxonomy Type species of genus Notholca Gosse, 1886._x000d_
not Notholca striata (Müller) after Wierzejski (1893), Weber (1898), von Hofsten (1910), Dieffenbach & Sachse (1912), Olofsson (1918), Jashnov (1922), ?Künne (1926); Anuraea striata (Müller) after Daday (1913)[=N. squamula (Müller)]; ?not N. striata (Müller) after Lie-Pettersen (1905)[=N. liepetterseni Björklund]; not N. striata (Müller) after Wulfert (1942)[=N. salina Focke?]; not N. striata (Müller) after Remane (1929; partim: Fig.81 left variety)[=N. psammarina Buchholz & Rühmann]_x000d_
Separation of the closely related species N. bipalium, N. liepetterseni, and N. striata heavily relies on biometric characters, albeit transitional forms exist. The taxonomy of this species complex is thus particularly confused, and in need of a thorough revision._x000d_
According to Björklund (1972)"The form recorded by him [Lie-Pettersen, 1905] as N. striata is certainly also N. liepetterseni, since the figure shows the typical body shape and dorsal spines. The mobile lateral spines are not shown, however, but they are easy to overlook when held alongside the lorica." [details]
not Notholca striata (Müller) after Wierzejski (1893), Weber (1898), von Hofsten (1910), Dieffenbach & Sachse (1912), Olofsson (1918), Jashnov (1922), ?Künne (1926); Anuraea striata (Müller) after Daday (1913)[=N. squamula (Müller)]; ?not N. striata (Müller) after Lie-Pettersen (1905)[=N. liepetterseni Björklund]; not N. striata (Müller) after Wulfert (1942)[=N. salina Focke?]; not N. striata (Müller) after Remane (1929; partim: Fig.81 left variety)[=N. psammarina Buchholz & Rühmann]_x000d_
Separation of the closely related species N. bipalium, N. liepetterseni, and N. striata heavily relies on biometric characters, albeit transitional forms exist. The taxonomy of this species complex is thus particularly confused, and in need of a thorough revision._x000d_
According to Björklund (1972)"The form recorded by him [Lie-Pettersen, 1905] as N. striata is certainly also N. liepetterseni, since the figure shows the typical body shape and dorsal spines. The mobile lateral spines are not shown, however, but they are easy to overlook when held alongside the lorica." [details]
Segers, H. (Ed.) (2025). World Rotifera database (FADA). Notholca striata (Müller, 1786). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=134999 on 2025-04-18
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
db_admin
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
(of Anourella lyra Bory de St. Vincent, 1826) Bory De Saint Vincent, J.-B. G. M. M. (1826). Essai d'une classification des animaux microscopiques. <em>Paris. Veuve Agasse.</em> XI+104. [details] 
original description (of Brachionus striatus Müller, 1786) Müller, O. F. (1786). Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina, quæ detexit, systematice descripsit et ad vivum delineari curavit. Havniæ, 367, pl.1-50, available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53299693 [details] Available for editors [request]
basis of record O'Reilly, M. (2001). Rotifera, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 149-151 (look up in IMIS) [details]
original description (of Brachionus striatus Müller, 1786) Müller, O. F. (1786). Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina, quæ detexit, systematice descripsit et ad vivum delineari curavit. Havniæ, 367, pl.1-50, available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53299693 [details] Available for editors
[request]basis of record O'Reilly, M. (2001). Rotifera, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 149-151 (look up in IMIS) [details]
Other
additional source
Shiel, R.; Smales, L.; Sterrer, W.; Duggan, I.C.; Pichelin, S.; Green, J.D. (2009). Phylum Gnathifera: lesser jaw worms, rotifers, thorny-headed worms, in: Gordon, D.P. (Ed.) (2009). New Zealand inventory of biodiversity: 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia. pp. 137-158. [details]
additional source Segers, H. (2007). Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa, 1564, 1-104, available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2007f/zt01564p104.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source Koste, W. (1978). Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungswerk, begründet von Max Voigt. Überordnung Monogononta. Berlin, Stuttgart. Gebrüder Borntraeger, 2, 673, 234 pls. [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source De Ridder, M. (1963). Recherches sur les Rotifières des eaux saumâtres: 10. Les Rotifières planktoniques de Nieuport et environs [Research on Rotifera of brackish waters: 10. The planktonic Rotifera of Nieuwpoort and surroundings]. <i>Med. K. Belg. Inst. Nat. Wet. 39(4)</i>: 1-39 (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source Segers, H. (2007). Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa, 1564, 1-104, available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2007f/zt01564p104.pdf [details] Available for editors
[request]additional source Koste, W. (1978). Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungswerk, begründet von Max Voigt. Überordnung Monogononta. Berlin, Stuttgart. Gebrüder Borntraeger, 2, 673, 234 pls. [details] Available for editors
[request]additional source De Ridder, M. (1963). Recherches sur les Rotifières des eaux saumâtres: 10. Les Rotifières planktoniques de Nieuport et environs [Research on Rotifera of brackish waters: 10. The planktonic Rotifera of Nieuwpoort and surroundings]. <i>Med. K. Belg. Inst. Nat. Wet. 39(4)</i>: 1-39 (look up in IMIS) [details]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Type species of genus Notholca Gosse, 1886._x000d_not Notholca striata (Müller) after Wierzejski (1893), Weber (1898), von Hofsten (1910), Dieffenbach & Sachse (1912), Olofsson (1918), Jashnov (1922), ?Künne (1926); Anuraea striata (Müller) after Daday (1913)[=N. squamula (Müller)]; ?not N. striata (Müller) after Lie-Pettersen (1905)[=N. liepetterseni Björklund]; not N. striata (Müller) after Wulfert (1942)[=N. salina Focke?]; not N. striata (Müller) after Remane (1929; partim: Fig.81 left variety)[=N. psammarina Buchholz & Rühmann]_x000d_
Separation of the closely related species N. bipalium, N. liepetterseni, and N. striata heavily relies on biometric characters, albeit transitional forms exist. The taxonomy of this species complex is thus particularly confused, and in need of a thorough revision._x000d_
According to Björklund (1972)"The form recorded by him [Lie-Pettersen, 1905] as N. striata is certainly also N. liepetterseni, since the figure shows the typical body shape and dorsal spines. The mobile lateral spines are not shown, however, but they are easy to overlook when held alongside the lorica." [details]
