WoRMS name details
Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905
143174 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:143174)
unaccepted
Species
Acrorhynchus Graff, 1882 accepted as Acrorhynchides Strand, 1928
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Graff, L. von. (1905). Marine Turbellarien Orottavas und der Küsten Europas. <em>Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftlige Zoologie.</em> 83: 68-150. With 6 plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/43242488 [details] 
Type locality contained in Ukrainian Exclusive Economic Zone
type locality contained in Ukrainian Exclusive Economic Zone [details]
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus ( and A. reprobatus), and Macrorhynchus bivittatus...
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus ( and A. reprobatus), and Macrorhynchus bivittatus has a complex history:
* According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
* According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
Tyler, S., Artois, T.; Schilling, S.; Hooge, M.; Bush, L.F. (eds) (2006-2024). World List of turbellarian worms: Acoelomorpha, Catenulida, Rhabditophora. Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=143174 on 2024-11-10
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Graff, L. von. (1905). Marine Turbellarien Orottavas und der Küsten Europas. <em>Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftlige Zoologie.</em> 83: 68-150. With 6 plates., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/43242488 [details]
basis of record Faubel, A.; Noreña, C. (2001). Turbellaria, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 123-136 (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors
[request]
basis of record Faubel, A.; Noreña, C. (2001). Turbellaria, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 123-136 (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors
[request]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus ( and A. reprobatus), and Macrorhynchus bivittatus has a complex history: * According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
