WoRMS source details
Bick, Andreas; Otte, Katrin ; Meissner, Karin. 2010. A contribution to the taxonomy of Spio (Spionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) occurring in the North and Baltic Seas, with a key to species recorded in this area. Marine Biodiversity 40(3): 161-180.
149097
Bick, A. ;.; Otte; Katrin, ;.; Meissner, K.
2010
A contribution to the taxonomy of Spio (Spionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) occurring in the North and Baltic Seas, with a key to species recorded in this area
Marine Biodiversity
40(3): 161-180
Publication
Polychaeta db
In order to resolve taxonomic problems known from literature and diagnostic practices, Spio species currently recognised in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea have been re-examined. Spio species recorded in the area of interest are S. decoratus, Spio cf. filicornis, S. goniocephala, S. martinensis, and S. armata. Spio decoratus is restricted to the North Sea, whereas S. armata occurs only in the Baltic Sea. Revised descriptions with illustrations and notes on the distributions, as well as remarks on size-dependent differences of characters, are presented for all species. Specimens of Spio from the North and Baltic Seas, which are assigned to S. filicornis based on current taxonomic literature, exhibit significant morphological differences, and are here regarded as two different species. A definite assignment of specimens from the two morphological distinct groups to one of the known Spio species was impossible based on the material available. The significance of diagnostic characters used for the identification of Spio spp. is discussed. An identification key to Spio species found in the investigation area is provided.
North Sea (and Channel)
Date
action
by
2013-01-12 18:30:12Z
created
db_admin
Spio armata (Thulin, 1957) (redescription)
Spio arndti Meißner, Bick & Bastrop, 2011 (additional source)
Spio symphyta Meißner, Bick & Bastrop, 2011 (additional source)
Spio arndti Meißner, Bick & Bastrop, 2011 (additional source)
Spio symphyta Meißner, Bick & Bastrop, 2011 (additional source)
Taxonomic remark
Both Maciolek (1990) and Bick et al. (2010) have commented on the poor type material (mid fragments only), but Bick ... [details]