WoRMS name details
Placoplegma solutum
1507699 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1507699)
unaccepted (misspelling of genus name)
Species
Placoplegma Schulze, 1896 accepted as Placopegma Schulze, 1896
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Placopegma solutum Schulze, 1896) Schulze, F.E. (1896 (1895)). Hexactinelliden des indischen Oceanes. II. Theil. Die Hexasterophora. <em>Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.</em> 3: 1-92, pls I-VIII.
page(s): 63-65 [details]
page(s): 63-65 [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Placoplegma solutum. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1507699 on 2024-11-12
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
(of Placopegma solutum Schulze, 1896) Schulze, F.E. (1896 (1895)). Hexactinelliden des indischen Oceanes. II. Theil. Die Hexasterophora. <em>Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.</em> 3: 1-92, pls I-VIII.
page(s): 63-65 [details]
basis of record Burton, M. (1959). Sponges. <em>In: Scientific Reports. John Murray Expedition 1933-34. 10(5). British Museum (Natural History): London.</em> Pp. 151-281., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/49512735
page(s): 153, 179; note: Burton (1959) misspelled the genus name and partly misidentified the material according to Tabachnick (2002). [details]
page(s): 63-65 [details]
basis of record Burton, M. (1959). Sponges. <em>In: Scientific Reports. John Murray Expedition 1933-34. 10(5). British Museum (Natural History): London.</em> Pp. 151-281., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/49512735
page(s): 153, 179; note: Burton (1959) misspelled the genus name and partly misidentified the material according to Tabachnick (2002). [details]