WoRMS name details

Lamellidoris bilamellata (Linnaeus, 1767)

153308  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:153308)

  1. Biota
  2. Animalia (Kingdom)
  3. Mollusca (Phylum)
  4. Gastropoda (Class)
  5. Heterobranchia (Subclass)
  6. Euthyneura (Infraclass)
  7. Ringipleura (Subterclass)
  8. Nudipleura (Superorder)
  9. Nudibranchia (Order)
  10. Doridina (Suborder)
  11. Doridoidei (Infraorder)
  12. Onchidoridoidea (Superfamily)
  13. Onchidorididae (Family)
  14. Lamellidoris (Genus)
  15. Lamellidoris bilamellata (Species)
 unaccepted
Species

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, fresh, terrestrial
(of Doris bilamellata Linnaeus, 1767) Linnaeus, C. (1767). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Ed. 12. 1., Regnum Animale. 1 & 2. <em>Holmiae [Stockholm], Laurentii Salvii.</em> pp. 1-532 [1766] pp. 533-1327 [1767]., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/83650#5 [details] OpenAccess publication
Taxonomy There are still nomenclature problems with Lamellidoris bilamellata. Limax bilamellatus is described by Linnaeus in 1761...  
Taxonomy There are still nomenclature problems with Lamellidoris bilamellata. Limax bilamellatus is described by Linnaeus in 1761 ("Fauna Svecica"). In 1767 Linnaeus changed it into Doris bilamellata with a reference to Limax bilamellatus ("Systema naturae"). So the corrct date of publication is 1761 and not 1767.


Some authors stated that Doris bilamellata should probably be seen as a complex; therefore the name Doris fusca Müller, 1776 would be a better option. According to Bouchet & Trady this name was published in the year 1768, but in this year Müller published only a figure, without any description (Pruvot-Fol 1954). Müller himself has placed his Doris fusca in synonomy with Linnaeus'Doris bilamellata.


Many authors prefer Onchidorus Blainville, 1816 as the valid name for the genus (Winckworth, 1932; Bouchet & Tardy, 1976; Thompson & Brown, 1976; Cattaneo & Barletta, 1984). According to Pruvot-Fol (1954) however this latter is a nomen nu [details]

MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Lamellidoris bilamellata (Linnaeus, 1767). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=153308 on 2024-11-12
Date
action
by
2005-04-15 07:47:28Z
created
Cuvelier, Daphne
2005-05-19 14:10:07Z
changed
Cuvelier, Daphne
2012-04-15 09:22:10Z
changed
Bouchet, Philippe

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description (of Doris bilamellata Linnaeus, 1767) Linnaeus, C. (1767). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Ed. 12. 1., Regnum Animale. 1 & 2. <em>Holmiae [Stockholm], Laurentii Salvii.</em> pp. 1-532 [1766] pp. 533-1327 [1767]., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/83650#5 [details] OpenAccess publication

basis of record Backeljau, T. (1986). Lijst van de recente mariene mollusken van België [List of the recent marine molluscs of Belgium]. Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen: Brussels, Belgium. 106 pp. (look up in IMIS) [details] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Unreviewed
Taxonomy There are still nomenclature problems with Lamellidoris bilamellata. Limax bilamellatus is described by Linnaeus in 1761 ("Fauna Svecica"). In 1767 Linnaeus changed it into Doris bilamellata with a reference to Limax bilamellatus ("Systema naturae"). So the corrct date of publication is 1761 and not 1767.


Some authors stated that Doris bilamellata should probably be seen as a complex; therefore the name Doris fusca Müller, 1776 would be a better option. According to Bouchet & Trady this name was published in the year 1768, but in this year Müller published only a figure, without any description (Pruvot-Fol 1954). Müller himself has placed his Doris fusca in synonomy with Linnaeus'Doris bilamellata.


Many authors prefer Onchidorus Blainville, 1816 as the valid name for the genus (Winckworth, 1932; Bouchet & Tardy, 1976; Thompson & Brown, 1976; Cattaneo & Barletta, 1984). According to Pruvot-Fol (1954) however this latter is a nomen nu [details]

To Biodiversity Heritage Library (57 publications) 
To ITIS

WoRMS

Using WoRMS

Tools

Connect with us

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-11-13 05:05:08+01:00 · Privacy and cookie policy