WoRMS name details
Gyrator bivittatus Uljanin, 1870
155711 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:155711)
unaccepted
Species
Gyrator Ehrenberg, 1835 accepted as Gyratrix Ehrenberg, 1831
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Uljanin, W. (1870). Die Turbellarien der Bucht von Sebastopol. <em>Berichte des Vereins der Freunde der Naturwissenschaften zu Moskou.</em> 96pp + 7pl. [details] 
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus, and Macrorhynchus bivittatus has a complex history:
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus, and Macrorhynchus bivittatus has a complex history:
* According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
* According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
Tyler, S., Artois, T.; Schilling, S.; Hooge, M.; Bush, L.F. (eds) (2006-2024). World List of turbellarian worms: Acoelomorpha, Catenulida, Rhabditophora. Gyrator bivittatus Uljanin, 1870. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=155711 on 2024-11-15
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Uljanin, W. (1870). Die Turbellarien der Bucht von Sebastopol. <em>Berichte des Vereins der Freunde der Naturwissenschaften zu Moskou.</em> 96pp + 7pl. [details]
Present Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark The taxonomy of the names Gyrator bivittatus, Acrorhynchus bivittatus, and Macrorhynchus bivittatus has a complex history: * According to Pereyeslawzewa (1894) and Fuhrmann (1904), all are synonymous. Moreover, Fuhrmann (1904) considers them synonymous with Macrorhynchus mamertinus/Macrorhynchus coeruleus/Gyrator reticulatus (all three now indeed considered synonyms of Progyrator mamertinus)
* According to Graff (1905: p. 121), Pereyaslawzewa and Fuhrmann are correct in synonymising M. mamertinus, M. coeruleus and G. reticulatus, but explicitly states that Gyrator bivittatus and Macrorhynchus bivittatus (= Acrorhynchus bivittatus) are not the same species as that one, and also themselves represent two different species. Hence he recognises three species: (i) Macrorhynchus mamertinus, (ii) Gyrator (= Macrorhynchus) bivittatus Uljanin, 1870, and (iii) Macrorhynchus bivittatus sensu Pereyaslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin, 1870. As in his works he considers all three of them as belonging to the same genus (Acrorhynchus), he is forced to coin a new name for "M. bivittatus sensu Pereyeslawzewa, 1892 nec Uljanin,1870", and he names it Acrorhynchus reprobatus Graff, 1905).
* Evdonin (1977; p. 265) considers all these names synonymous of Progyrator mamertinus, which considering the original descriptions interpreted in the framework of modern practice and standards in polycystidid taxonomy is a correct decision. Therefore, this view is followed here.
[details]
