WoRMS taxon details
Pentaceraster magnificus (Goto, 1914)
378480 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:378480)
accepted
Species
Oreaster magnificus Goto, 1914 · unaccepted
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Oreaster magnificus Goto, 1914) Goto, S. (1914). A descriptive monograph of Japanese Asteroidea. 1. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 29: 1-808, plates 1-19., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7068310
page(s): 457 [details]
page(s): 457 [details]
Mah, C.L. (2025). World Asteroidea Database. Pentaceraster magnificus (Goto, 1914). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=378480 on 2025-04-16
Date
action
by
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 License
Nomenclature
original description
(of Oreaster magnificus Goto, 1914) Goto, S. (1914). A descriptive monograph of Japanese Asteroidea. 1. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 29: 1-808, plates 1-19., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7068310
page(s): 457 [details]
basis of record Liu, J.Y. [Ruiyu] (ed.). (2008). Checklist of marine biota of China seas. <em>China Science Press.</em> 1267 pp. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors
[request]
page(s): 457 [details]
basis of record Liu, J.Y. [Ruiyu] (ed.). (2008). Checklist of marine biota of China seas. <em>China Science Press.</em> 1267 pp. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors

Other
context source (HKRMS)
Wai, T. C., Ng, W. C., Leung, K. M. Y. & Williams, G. A. (2011). Stock and ecological status of echinoderms in Hong Kong: evaluation of effectiveness of marine protected areas using sea urchins as model organism. Final report. Submitted to the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Hong Kong SAR Government. [details]
From editor or global species database
Synonymy Possibly a synonym of Pentaceraster regulus (Muller & Troschel, 1842) according to Hayashi (1938) but treated as valid by A.M. Clark (1982). [details]