WoRMS name details
Delphinus livittatus F. Cuvier, 1836
383871 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:383871)
unaccepted > misspelling - incorrect subsequent spelling
Species
marine, terrestrial
Cuvier, F. (1836). De l'histoire naturelle des cétacés [From the natural history of cetaceans]. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, France. [details]
Taxonomic remark Incorrect subsequent spelling. A misspelling of Delphinus bivittatus Lesson in Lesson and Garnot, 1827. According to...
Taxonomic remark Incorrect subsequent spelling. A misspelling of Delphinus bivittatus Lesson in Lesson and Garnot, 1827. According to Hershkovitz (1966), “regarded as not certainly identifiable.” [details]
Fordyce, E.; Perrin, W.F. (2024). World Cetacea Database. Delphinus livittatus F. Cuvier, 1836. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=383871 on 2024-11-07
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Cuvier, F. (1836). De l'histoire naturelle des cétacés [From the natural history of cetaceans]. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, France. [details]
taxonomy source Vollmer, N. L.; Ashe, E.; Brownell, R. L.; Cipriano, F.; Mead, J. G.; Reeves, R. R.; Soldevilla, M. S.; Williams, R. (2019). Taxonomic revision of the dolphin genus Lagenorhynchus. <em>Marine Mammal Science.</em> 35(3): 957-1057., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12573 [details] Available for editors [request]
taxonomy source Vollmer, N. L.; Ashe, E.; Brownell, R. L.; Cipriano, F.; Mead, J. G.; Reeves, R. R.; Soldevilla, M. S.; Williams, R. (2019). Taxonomic revision of the dolphin genus Lagenorhynchus. <em>Marine Mammal Science.</em> 35(3): 957-1057., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12573 [details] Available for editors [request]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark Incorrect subsequent spelling. A misspelling of Delphinus bivittatus Lesson in Lesson and Garnot, 1827. According to Hershkovitz (1966), “regarded as not certainly identifiable.” [details]