WoRMS name details

Jugosocythereis lactea (Brady, 1866)

786122  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:786122)

 unaccepted > misapplication (superseded combination, this combination was based on specimens collected to the publication Holden, 1976, not on type material of Cythere lactea, for which only a simple sketch (Brady, 1866) was available. Therefore, it cannot be accepted herein)
Species
marine, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Cythere lactea Brady, 1866) Brady, G. S. (1866). On new or imperfectly known species of marine Ostracoda. <em>Transactions of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 5: 359-393. [details] OpenAccess publication
Brandão, S.N.; Antonietto, L.S; Nery, D.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Praxedes, R.A.; Santos, S.G.; Karanovic, I. (2025). World Ostracoda Database. Jugosocythereis lactea (Brady, 1866). Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=786122 on 2025-04-16
Date
action
by
2014-08-04 12:07:27Z
created
2016-06-30 10:37:12Z
changed
2016-08-24 13:30:47Z
changed
2018-03-09 12:23:55Z
changed
2018-04-12 12:39:05Z
changed
2023-08-17 21:19:06Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


Nomenclature

original description (of Cythere lactea Brady, 1866) Brady, G. S. (1866). On new or imperfectly known species of marine Ostracoda. <em>Transactions of the Zoological Society of London.</em> 5: 359-393. [details] OpenAccess publication

new combination reference Holden, J. C. (1976). Late cenozoic Ostracoda from Midway Island drill holes. <em>U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper.</em> 680, 1–43.
page(s): F25; note: Misidentification (Holden (1976) implicitly proposed the new combination of Cythere lactea with the genus Jugosocythereis based on specimens studied in his 1976, instead of the type spe...    
Misidentification (Holden (1976) implicitly proposed the new combination of Cythere lactea with the genus Jugosocythereis based on specimens studied in his 1976, instead of the type specimens of Cythere lactea. Therefore this combination is not valid.
[details] Available for editors  PDF available [request]