WoRMS name details
Spiroglyphus Daudin, 1800
818567 (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:818567)
uncertain > nomen dubium (invalid: on Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology)
Genus
Vermetus (Spiroglyphus) Daudin, 1800 · unaccepted (invalid: on Official Index of...)
invalid: on Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology
- Species Spiroglyphus tricarinatus Yokoyama, 1924 † (uncertain > unassessed)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
masculine
Daudin, François Marie. (1800). Receuil de mémoires et de notes sur des espèces inédites ou peu connues de Mollusques, de vers et de zoophytes. xviii & 19-50. Fuchs & Treuttel et Wurtz. Paris., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/96153
page(s): 39 [details]
page(s): 39 [details]
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus...
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus Daudin, 1800. Widely used since the 1840s as molluscan genus and mostly applied to entrenching vermetids in today’s concept of Dendropoma. Hartman (1959: 47) included Spiroglyphus in her list of possible polychaete annelid genera. Keen (1961: 184, 191) stated that the included species “should probably classed as annelids” and for Spiroglyphus it is “advisable to set it aside as a genus dubium”; she subsequently (Keen & Hadfield 1985) sought suppression of the name under I.C.Z.N. rules. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology in Opinion 1425 (I.C.Z.N. 1987). [see Bieler & Petit, 2011: 18-19] [details]
MolluscaBase eds. (2024). MolluscaBase. Spiroglyphus Daudin, 1800. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=818567 on 2024-11-20
The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
original description
Daudin, François Marie. (1800). Receuil de mémoires et de notes sur des espèces inédites ou peu connues de Mollusques, de vers et de zoophytes. xviii & 19-50. Fuchs & Treuttel et Wurtz. Paris., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/96153
page(s): 39 [details]
status source Bieler, R. & Petit, R. E. (2011). Catalogue of Recent and fossil “worm-snail” taxa of the families Vermetidae, Siliquariidae, and Turritellidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2948: 1-103., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt02948p103.pdf
page(s): 18-19 [details] Available for editors
[request]
status source ICZN. (1987). Opinion 1425. Suppressed: <i>Spiroglyphus</i> Daudin, 1800 and <i>Stoa</i> De Serres, Mollusca, Gastropoda) and specific names published in combination with them. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 44(1): 57-58., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12229416 [details]
page(s): 39 [details]
status source Bieler, R. & Petit, R. E. (2011). Catalogue of Recent and fossil “worm-snail” taxa of the families Vermetidae, Siliquariidae, and Turritellidae (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2948: 1-103., available online at http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2011/f/zt02948p103.pdf
page(s): 18-19 [details] Available for editors
[request]status source ICZN. (1987). Opinion 1425. Suppressed: <i>Spiroglyphus</i> Daudin, 1800 and <i>Stoa</i> De Serres, Mollusca, Gastropoda) and specific names published in combination with them. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature. 44(1): 57-58., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12229416 [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Status This nominal genus was introduced with two nominal species, Spiroglyphus politus Daudin, 1800 and Spiroglyphus annulatus Daudin, 1800. Widely used since the 1840s as molluscan genus and mostly applied to entrenching vermetids in today’s concept of Dendropoma. Hartman (1959: 47) included Spiroglyphus in her list of possible polychaete annelid genera. Keen (1961: 184, 191) stated that the included species “should probably classed as annelids” and for Spiroglyphus it is “advisable to set it aside as a genus dubium”; she subsequently (Keen & Hadfield 1985) sought suppression of the name under I.C.Z.N. rules. Placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names in Zoology in Opinion 1425 (I.C.Z.N. 1987). [see Bieler & Petit, 2011: 18-19] [details]
