Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

Data Policy
Persons | Institutes | Publications | Projects | Datasets
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page
one publication added to basket [367039]
Ocean color atmospheric correction methods in view of usability for different optical water types
Hieronymi, M.; Bi, S.; Müller, D.; Schütt, E.M.; Behr, D.; Brockmann, C.; Lebreton, C.; Steinmetz, F.; Stelzer, K.; Vanhellemont, Q. (2023). Ocean color atmospheric correction methods in view of usability for different optical water types. Front. Mar. Sci. 10: 1129876. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1129876
In: Frontiers in Marine Science. Frontiers Media: Lausanne. e-ISSN 2296-7745
Related to:
Hieronymi, M.; Bi, S.; Mueller, D.; Schuett, E.M.; Behr, D.; Brockmann, C.; Lebreton, C.; Steinmetz, F.; Stelzer, K.; Vanhellemont, Q. (2023). Corrigendum: Ocean color atmospheric correction methods in view of usability for different optical water types. Front. Mar. Sci. 10: 1307517. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1307517, more
Peer reviewed article  
Available in  Authors 
Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Authors  Top 
  • Hieronymi, M.
  • Bi, S.
  • Müller, D.
  • Schütt, E.M.
  • Behr, D.
  • Brockmann, C.
  • Lebreton, C.
  • Steinmetz, F.
  • Stelzer, K.
  • Vanhellemont, Q.
Abstract
    Satellite remote sensing allows large-scale global observations of aquatic ecosystems and matter fluxes from the source through rivers and lakes to coasts, marginal seas into the open ocean. Fuzzy logic classification of optical water types (OWT) is increasingly used to optimally determine water properties and enable seamless transitions between water types. However, effective exploitation of this method requires a successful atmospheric correction (AC) over the entire spectral range, i.e., the upstream AC is suitable for each water type and always delivers classifiable remote-sensing reflectances. In this study, we compare five different AC methods for Sentinel-3/OLCI ocean color imagery, namely IPF, C2RCC, A4O, POLYMER, and ACOLITE-DSF (all in the 2022 current version). We evaluate their results, i.e., remote-sensing reflectance, in terms of spatial exploitability, individual flagging, spectral plausibility compared to in situ data, and OWT classifiability with four different classification schemes. Especially the results of A4O show that it is beneficial if the performance spectrum of the atmospheric correction is tailored to an OWT system and vice versa. The study gives hints on how to improve AC performance, e.g., with respect to homogeneity and flagging, but also how an OWT classification system should be designed for global deployment.
All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 
[Back]

WoRMS

Using WoRMS

Tools

Connect with us

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-11-14 06:14:23+01:00 · Privacy and cookie policy