Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS)

Data Policy
Persons | Institutes | Publications | Projects | Datasets
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Euechinoidea and Cidaroidea respond differently to ocean acidification
Collard, M.; Dery, A.; Dehairs, F.; Dubois, P. (2014). Euechinoidea and Cidaroidea respond differently to ocean acidification. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 174: 45-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.04.011
In: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology. Elsevier: New York. ISSN 1095-6433; e-ISSN 1531-4332
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Cidaroidea Gray, 1825 [WoRMS]; Echinodermata [WoRMS]; Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck, 1816) [WoRMS]; Euechinoidea [WoRMS]; Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) [WoRMS]; Tripneustes ventricosus (Lamarck, 1816) [WoRMS]
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Echinoderms; Sea urchins; Euechinoids; Cidaroids; Ocean acidification;Acid-base regulation; Buffer capacity; Paracentrotus lividus;Tripneustes ventricosus; Eucidaris tribuloides

Authors  Top 
  • Collard, M.
  • Dery, A.
  • Dehairs, F.
  • Dubois, P.

Abstract
    The impact of the chemical changes in the ocean waters due to the increasing atmospheric CO2 depends on the ability of an organism to control extracellular pH. Among sea urchins, this seems specific to the Euechinoidea, sea urchins except Cidaroidea. However, Cidaroidea survived two ocean acidification periods: the Permian–Trias and the Cretaceous–Tertiary crises. We investigated the response of these two sea urchin groups to reduced seawater pH with the tropical cidaroid Eucidaris tribuloides, the sympatric euechinoid Tripneustes ventricosus and the temperate euechinoid Paracentrotus lividus. Both euechinoid showed a compensation of the coelomic fluid pH due to increased buffer capacity. This was linked to an increased concentration of DIC in the coelomic fluid and thus of bicarbonate ions (most probably originating from the surrounding seawater as isotopic signature of the carbon – d13C – was similar). On the other hand, the cidaroid showed no changes within the coelomic fluid. Moreover, the d13C of the coelomic fluid did not match that of the seawater and was not significantly different between the urchins from the different treatments. Feeding rate was not affected in any species. While euechinoids are able to regulate their extracellular acid–base balance, many questions are still unanswered on the costs of this capacity. On the contrary, cidaroids do not seem affected by a reduced seawater pH. Further investigations need to be undertaken to cover more species and physiological and metabolic parameters in order to determine if energy trade-offs occur and how this mechanism of compensation is distributed among sea urchins.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 
[Back]